Stephen A. Smith has once again weighed in on Caitlin Clark’s influence, offering a strong defense of the Indiana Fever star amidst recent controversies. Clark, who was named Time Magazine’s Athlete of the Year, found herself at the center of debates following her comments about white privilege and her advocacy for her fellow WNBA players. While her remarks sparked backlash from conservative figures like Megyn Kelly, Clark received support from other influential figures, including Dave Portnoy and Ryan Clark. Despite the media whirlwind, Smith emphasized that Clark’s intentions are to help elevate the WNBA, not to undermine others.
Smith expressed his admiration for Clark’s impact on the sport, pointing out how her presence has positively affected the league’s progression. He specifically highlighted her role in improving travel conditions for WNBA players, noting that after Clark joined the league, chartered flights were secured just weeks later—something that had been a long-standing issue for players. In Smith’s view, Clark has contributed significantly to raising the profile of the WNBA, including increasing attendance for Indiana Fever games and boosting TV ratings. He believes Clark’s efforts have directly contributed to the league’s upward trajectory, despite some ongoing challenges.
Smith further criticized the resentment directed at Clark, pointing out that the focus should be on dismantling the systemic issues that have historically hindered the WNBA’s recognition, rather than resenting those who are working to push the sport forward. He clarified that Clark has not done anything to actively harm others or deny them opportunities; instead, she has used her platform to help bring visibility to issues within the league. “Be resentful against the system,” Smith urged, “not against the individuals, like Caitlin, who are actively trying to improve the game.”
Drawing historical parallels, Smith reminded listeners that progress in civil rights has often been driven by allies from different backgrounds, and Clark’s contributions should be viewed in that light. He emphasized that, much like those who supported the Civil Rights Movement, Clark is not the enemy, but rather someone who is trying to make positive change for all. Smith argued that it is vital for people to embrace those who want to help, especially when they have the ability to make a significant difference in a sport that continues to struggle with visibility and financial stability.
Ultimately, Smith’s message was clear: Caitlin Clark is a force for good in the WNBA, and it’s time for critics to stop resenting her and recognize the progress she is helping to create. The key to moving forward is to appreciate those who contribute to the sport’s growth, rather than focus on old grievances. Smith’s passionate defense of Clark highlights the importance of unity and support in driving change, both in sports and society.
