
The California Court of Appeals has officially denied Tory Lanez’s petitions to introduce new evidence in connection with his conviction for the 2020 shooting of rapper Megan Thee Stallion. The ruling marks the latest setback for the Canadian artist, whose legal team has spent months attempting to challenge the outcome of a trial that captivated the music world and drew widespread public attention.
Lanez, born Daystar Peterson, was convicted in December 2022 on three felony counts, including assault with a semiautomatic firearm, after prosecutors successfully argued that he shot Megan Thee Stallion in the feet following an argument after a Hollywood Hills party. The jury’s decision followed weeks of dramatic testimony, including Megan’s own account of the incident, which she said left her traumatized and unfairly targeted by public criticism. Lanez, meanwhile, has consistently maintained his innocence, and his attorneys have aggressively pursued appeals in hopes of overturning the verdict.
The petitions recently reviewed by the appellate court centered on his legal team’s efforts to introduce new evidence they claimed would cast doubt on key aspects of the trial. While the specific evidence was not fully detailed in the court’s summary ruling, Lanez’s camp had previously argued that testimony from additional witnesses and forensic interpretations could have altered the jury’s perspective. However, the appellate panel determined that the defense had not met the threshold required for the submission of such evidence, concluding that it would not have significantly changed the outcome of the trial.
The denial is a significant blow to Lanez’s legal strategy, as it further solidifies his conviction and makes his path to a successful appeal increasingly narrow. His legal team can still pursue additional appeals to higher courts, including the California Supreme Court, but each denial makes it more difficult to overturn the original ruling. At present, Lanez remains sentenced to 10 years in prison, a term handed down in August 2023 that reflected both the severity of the crime and its impact on Megan Thee Stallion.
The case has been one of the most high-profile criminal proceedings involving music artists in recent years. Beyond the courtroom, it sparked heated debates about the treatment of women in the hip-hop industry, accountability for acts of violence, and the broader issue of public perception in cases involving celebrities. Megan herself became a focal point in the conversation, as she publicly shared her struggles with mental health and backlash during the trial. For many fans and advocates, the conviction was seen as a moment of validation for her testimony and a broader stand against attempts to discredit women who come forward with allegations of abuse.
Lanez’s supporters, however, remain vocal, with many continuing to question the fairness of the trial and the motives behind the prosecution. His defense team has leaned on that support in its appeals, framing the case as one that deserves further scrutiny. Yet with the appellate court’s latest ruling, the likelihood of a dramatic reversal appears increasingly remote.
For Megan Thee Stallion, the decision represents another legal affirmation of her account of the events. While she has largely stepped away from publicly discussing the trial in detail since the sentencing, the outcome of these appeals continues to resonate with her fan base, many of whom view it as a critical moment in her career and personal life.
As the legal process moves forward, the denial from the California Court of Appeals narrows the avenues available to Lanez and underscores the difficulty of overturning a jury’s verdict once all standard trial procedures have been completed. His case will remain under close watch, both by the legal community and the entertainment industry, as it continues to represent a crossroads between celebrity culture, justice, and public opinion.
Do you want me to expand this further with more background on the appeals process in California to explain why the court likely rejected the petitions?